With the amount of content available out there. There's a variety of tools I briefly considered that never made the cut: Pinboard,, Raindrop.io, etc. Always had to use something other than Evernote for web annotations and comments or pdf annotations and comment. The annotation tools were impossible to use. It was fast and flexible and could consume anything. Their web clipper is great, you can email content, use PDFs or images. Each product's score is calculated with real-time data from verified user reviews, to help you make the best choice between these two options, and decide which one is best for your business needs. By contrast, ReadCube Papers rates 4.4/5 stars with 114 reviews. I don't know if this has been remediated.Įvernote I always thought was the best at consuming content. Paperpile rates 4.5/5 stars with 25 reviews. But it was missing a full-text search and the "clipper" was not great. Polar Bookshelf was always attractive to me. my computer becomes hot and battery drains pretty fast. (It takes most of my 5 m upload speed/100m download speed) 3. I still use the Kindle app to consume books so that's where highlights go also.Īll my personal notes, including key URLs at times, special highlights related to a topic, and other similar content will end-up in Roam with my other personal notes. when computer in idle, 'readcube or papers' is the only app using CPU, DISK or network that makes me even unable to video chat. I've recently started centralizing highlights in Readwise.io but primarily Kindle highlights get there. I keep the papers in this library because it processes the metadata automatically and I can list papers by key topics, look at authors and easily create highlights and citations. Science and research papers have stayed separate in Paperpile. In Diigo I can organize things easily, can store a web link or cache the full-page, and can mix-up highlights of PDFs of web articles. I've tried Instapaper, Evernote, Google Bookmarks and Pockets for this, but there was always a shortfall. It's not the most modern of tools but it surprisingly handles everything I need quite well. But I have yet to be able to keep it to ONE.Īs of now: Web Article/bookmark, Web article/highlights, Web article/full-text with search, Long-form PDF/highlights, Long-form PDF/full-text with search all end-up in Diigo. One of my goals was to keep the number of places to search to a minimum. * Science Paper/full-text with search + citations Because not everybody handles the same type of content from the same places. But I look at it this way.įirst, one must check the inputs involved. Multiple input types end-up with multiple workflows or pipelines and it spreads my "information" around too much. This general flow has remained a core issue for me over the years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |